OHDSI Home | Forums | Wiki | Github

New working group: Medical Device Working group

(Kin-Wah Fung) #41

Hi, I’d like to participate. I’m familiar with device terms in SNOMED CT and GMDN.

(Vojtech Huser) #42

The notes from today’s meeting are in the running notes google doc linked from https://www.ohdsi.org/web/wiki/doku.php?id=projects:workgroups:devices

(Dan O'Leary) #43

There is a thread name IUD Study Updates. It appears to have three cohorts related to different types of IUDs.

Since an IUD is a device, I wonder if the IUD study includes device specific information valuable to this group. Also, is there an opportunity to include other device specific information based on the interests of this group?

(Vojtech Huser) #44

Due to COVID-19 study-a-thon and other covid tasks, I will not be able to lead the meeting (and provide the webex room for it). If rest of the group still wants to meet anyway, please coordinate via this thread (or email).

(Eduard Korchmar (Terminologist @ Odysseus Vocabulary Team)) #45

Hello everyone! Writing here, since I could not locate a dedicated Device WG channel.

We have recently started conversation with International SNOMED CT team. One of their short term goals is improving their own Device hierarchy. They are looking for external feedback and usecases.

Given that SNOMED is our de-facto standard for mappings for Device domain concepts (however little standardisation there is made now), we are interested in providing data for them and cooperating on making SNOMED’s device hierarchy the most suitable to OMOP CDM users needs.

Main two questions we were asked by SNOMED:

  1. What types of Devices are of most interest to community? E.g. what devices are to be subjected to observational research.
  2. What types of Devices are most often encountered in source data? Especially if they map or can be mapped to SNOMED CT concepts.

SNOMED team needs answers to know where to focus their efforts first.

(Leilei Zhu (Clinical Data Standards Lead, UCLH, UK)) #46

Hi, in the UK, we use dm+d (drugs,medication and devices) as the data standard for devices.

(Dan O'Leary) #47

I’m a consultant working with medical device manufacturers. I’m interested in the use of UDI information at the facility level (inventory management) and at patient level (EHR). From previous discussions, I understand that UDI information is rarely, if ever, captured in EHR data.

I was asked about patient labels, little labels often stuck to charts. The question is in a few parts:

What should be on such as label?

Is there a common expectation across hospital for the label layout and content?

Is there a standard that defines the label?

Should the label include the UDI or, at least, the UDI-DI?

Does the label content get into the EHR and could be used to identify the device for some kind of comparative analysis.

(Dan O'Leary) #48

Will there be a meeting on May 28, 2020?

(Vojtech Huser) #49

May 28th meeting is cancelled. (due to COVID-19 research tasks of some of us)

(Asiyah Lin) #50

Hi all,

We are planning for the next meeting on July 23rd (in two weeks), 10AM-11AM ET.
Please block your calendar for the time if you will be available to join.

Tentative agenda:

  1. Introduction of UDI
  2. Updates on COVID19 related medical device RWE or other activities – how OMOP capture the device exposure, such as ventilators.

Please suggest the topic you will be interested to discuss with the group.