Vocab Request - Additional Type Concepts for Claims Provenance

[MPhilofsky (Melanie Philofsky)]

Linking an old post on how we define the type_concept_id field:

@MPhilofsky

when we discussed splitting the “status” of a condition out from the condition_type_concept_id, it was decided a type_concept_id can be identified if it finishes this sentence: “This record is derived from ______”.

So, based on your use case:

@Dan_Angelelli

distinguishing a “Pre-Adjudicated facility claim” from “Adjudicated facility claim”

Your answer will be ‘facility claim’ for both of the above examples. We should NOT cram further information into the field. That is why we split the condition_status information out of the type_concept_id field long ago.

I suggest you follow up on your idea:

@Dan_Angelelli

I think a separate column like adjudication_status_concept_id would be reasonable

And compare it to @Christian_Reich suggestion using real data and real questions.