Hello,
The concept names for the Derived SEER Pathological Stage use roman numerals while the concept names for the Derived SEER Clinical Stage are a mix of roman numerals and numbers. Should there be consistent nomenclature for both vocabularies?
Derived SEER Path Stg Grp (35918668)
Stage 0
Stage 0A
Stage 0is
Stage I
Stage IA
Stage IA1
Stage IA2
Stage IB
Stage IB1
Stage IB2
Stage IC
Stage II
Stage IIA
Stage IIA1
Stage IIA2
Stage IIB
Stage IIC
Stage III
Stage IIIA
Stage IIIB
Stage IIIC
Stage IIIC1
Stage IIIC2
Stage IS
Stage IV
Stage IVA
Stage IVA1
Stage IVA2
Stage IVB
Stage IVC
Unknown
Derived SEER Clin Stg Grp (35918772)
Stage 0
Stage 0A
Stage 0is
Stage 2
Stage 2A
Stage 2A1
Stage 2A2
Stage 2B
Stage 2C
Stage 3
Stage 3A
Stage 3B
Stage 3C
Stage 3C1
Stage 3C2
Stage 4
Stage 4A
Stage 4A1
Stage 4A2
Stage 4B
Stage 4C
Stage I
Stage IA
Stage IA1
Stage IA2
Stage IB
Stage IB1
Stage IC
Stage IS
Stage OC
Unknown
Also, both sets are missing concepts for Stage IA3, Stage IEA, Stage IIIA2, Stage IIID and Stage IIIE. These are less frequently assigned but would be nice to have.
Thanks,
Tina
Queries
select concept_name, concept_code, vocabulary_id
from concept
where concept_id in (
select concept_id_2
from concept_relationship
where concept_id_1 = 35918772 --Derived SEER Clin Stg Grp
and relationship_id = ‘Has Answer’)
order by concept_name;
select concept_name, concept_code, vocabulary_id
from concept
where concept_id in (
select concept_id_2
from concept_relationship
where concept_id_1 = 35918668 --Derived SEER Path Stg Grp
and relationship_id = ‘Has Answer’)
order by concept_name;