Many domain="Type Concept" stoped being standard. What to do?

[Javier (Javier Gracia-Tabuenca)]

We use “Primary Condition” and “Secondary Condition” in condition_type_concept_id to differentitate the level of diagnose.

However, I notice that several of the codes under domain=“Type Concept” are now non-standard.
(It has not been updated in Atlas-demo

)

Now, the accepted concepts for condition_type_concept_id are now significantly less.

How should we keep the same info as before: “Primary Condition” and “Secondary Condition”

[Javier (Javier Gracia-Tabuenca)]

I actually found this conversation

Concept Type consolidation - please take a look

Friends: This is a proposal for the the long-awaited consolidation of Type Concepts. Right now, Type Concepts are organized by Domain, creating a ton of duplications, and they are a wild mixture of provenance and categorization (really “type”) indicators. Also, some of them are badly pre-coordinated and many are not intelligible if you don’t know the US reimbursement claims system. This is a proposal to fix all that: Type Concepts now really indicate provenance. We should rename them to “Pr…

Where Primary / Secondady should be set in CONDITION_STATUS_CONCEPT_ID

But now I have the question, how to use Atlas to filter based on CONDITION_STATUS_CONCEPT_ID ??

[Chris_Knoll]

But now I have the question, how to use Atlas to filter based on CONDITION_STATUS_CONCEPT_ID ??

This will be an option in the 2.8 release, which should be released by end of year.

[Javier (Javier Gracia-Tabuenca)]

That is great, looking forward
The new organization looks much cleaner,