The Heel rule 1 logic on analysis 510 requires that all deaths are observed inside an observation period.
In the DQ study results, this rule fires quite often on many datasets.
I think if death event is imported from an external source (e.g., Social Security Death Index), it may be fine (perhaps just a notification) that it falls outside an observation period.
I was hoping to untangle at least some of the rule_1/analysis pairs into separate rules.
Rule 1 and rule 2 are checking a lot of DQ issues at the same time and the drill down logic would be different. If the rule_id is the same, it is hard to support the drill down.
In this case, it could also be changed to a warning. Since a patient can move out of a given state and death is later matched from a national source.
What other users think about rule_id 1 and analysis 510 and “umbrella rules” (rules that check 5+ (sometimes quite varying) data quality issues in one “batch” in general?
ERROR: 510-Number of death records outside valid observation period; count (n=xxxxx) should not be > 0