OHDSI Home | Forums | Wiki | Github

Collecting a large set of analyses where claims data is fit for purpose

Just sharing with other researchers.
This article by Schneeweiss (always good to read any articles by that team btw).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380458311_Emulation_of_randomized_trials_of_direct_oral_anticoagulants_with_claims_data_and_implications_for_new_Factor_XI_inhibitors

has a great list of analyses where claims data was found fit for purpose.

I collect such analyses as a mechanism to testdrive a dataset on analysis where I have some estimate of what I expect to see.

table of trials here:

A second nice set are all Darwin EMA studies (in recently published EMA catalog)

(link is using filter darwin=yes)

https://catalogues.ema.europa.eu/search?f[0]=content_type%3Adarwin_study&f[1]=study_run_darwin_eu%3A1

Do you have some other sources such that a researcher can arrive at a set of 300+ past questions where there is protocol published and indication that claims data was found as ‘fit for purpose’ ? (Note: regulatory grade !; initiated by FDA (or contract funded by them), EMA, etc.)

t