I’m happy to announce that the OHDSI Symposium Organizing Committee is now accepting submission abstracts for poster presentations at the first annual OHDSI Symposium to be held on October 20th, 2015 in Washington DC.
@ericaVoss -
Re: Submission - Only the abstract is required for submission
Re: Poster - Yes, successful poster submissions should include both an abstract and conflict of interest statement
I also wanted to try the arxiv.org that @hripcsa mentioned under Quantitative Biology. In setting it up I just picked the licenses “arXiv.org perpetual, non-exclusive license to distribute this article”. The part I’m stuck on now is having an endorser.
@hripcsa / @MauraBeaton - Marc has kindly endorsed me so I could submit. Would you like me to try submitting the abstract to arXiv? Marc seems to indicate this is not appropriate to submit an abstract however do I recall you mentioning something that you believe we can use arXiv in this manner.
I’m open to vetting this process . . . but want to make sure it is something you want to push forward on.
I don’t know but I think we should try it. It is not really an abstract (eg, 150 words) but a 2-page paper with potential figures and references. So it may in fact qualify. George
It looks fairly safe in terms of not limiting the potential for future
acceptance by a journal. However, it seems that the intention is for full journal article manuscripts that are ready for peer review to be
submitted. Erica’s 2-pager is not manuscript for journal submission so I
wonder if it would better to consider submitting it, and the other
“abstracts”, to CUER workshop proceedings: http://ceur-ws.org/. Here is
their policy: http://ceur-ws.org/HOWTOSUBMIT.html
Perhaps it is too quick to figure this out for this iteration of the Symposium. In general, I think it is a good approach for OHDSI, and the next step would be to create a more relevant category. I think quantitative medicine was one suggestion (even if it is under quantitative biology).