Discharge_to_concept_id vocabulary different in documentation vs RiaH

[Diego_Bosca_Tomas (Diego Boscá Tomás)]

From RiaH I’m getting that the discharge_to_concept_id should come to the “Place of service” vocabulary (all terms non-standard), and from the CDM v5.3.1 documentation it says it comes from “Visit” domain.

Which is the right one? Can actually non-standard terms be put in a *_concept_id at all?

[Dymshyts (Dmytry Dymshyts)]

@Diego_Bosca_Tomas

RiaH

Not sure what RiaH means, google search just gives me this

@Diego_Bosca_Tomas

CDM v5.3.1 documentation it says it comes from “Visit” domain.

Yes, it should be populated by “Visit” domain concepts. The “Place of service” is an obsolete domain now.

@Diego_Bosca_Tomas

Can actually non-standard terms be put in a *_concept_id at all?

No. That’s a general rule of OMOP CDM: only standard concepts are used.

[Diego_Bosca_Tomas (Diego Boscá Tomás)]

Thanks, RiaH is an EHDEN tool, Rabbit In a Hat

[Dymshyts (Dmytry Dymshyts)]

I see. That’s an overall OMOP tool, not only EHDEN specific.
Can you please submit the issue here https://github.com/OHDSI/WhiteRabbit/issues

[Diego_Bosca_Tomas (Diego Boscá Tomás)]

@Diego_Bosca_Tomas

“Place of service”

done

discharge_to_concept_id description points to an outdated vocabulary